All-payer claims databases (APCDs) would benefit from mapping morbidity rates to the data resulting in pricing transparency, as well as pricing, efficiency and performance assessments that can be compared among providers. Mapping morbidity rates using publicly available data would create a clear idea of healthcare effectiveness and enrich the data, enabling patterns of care and value to emerge and in result, improve the future of healthcare. Here's a preview of Virginia Long and David Mould's piece on iHealthBeat that went live today:
All-payer claims databases (APCDs) that are in place in several states and about to be implemented in many more, are intended to make provider and hospital costs transparent. The readily available data within the APCDs includes claims data for medical, mental health, pharmacy, and dental procedures across providers. Access to this data enables analysis, analysis that can be done to make important comparisons such as price for services or performance measures at the level of physician or hospital—across a state. Thus, the APCDs can provide powerful and illuminating information, from tracking state healthcare spending to guiding patient/consumer choices.
Augmenting APCD data
Although APCDs can provide useful information on cost and value of healthcare within a state, augmenting the claims data with publically available morbidity data would provide users with a more holistic dataset where cost information is directly tied to clinical outcomes. Mapping disease morbidity information to APCDs would allow effectiveness of treatment to be assessed, alongside cost and quality measures. Treatment costs relative to disease burden within distinct locations can be used to pinpoint areas with health disparities, highlighting potential problems or incongruities in access to or quality of care.
Health and Morbidity Data
Publically available health data is available through many sources. A few of the major health related data sources are the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Community Health Status Indicators (CHSI), and the County Health Rankings. The CDC is not just concerned with communicable diseases; they are at the forefront of the fight against chronic diseases that adversely affect health in America. CDC data on disease are readily available and data maps for social determinants of health have the potential to bring together highly relevant and sometimes overlooked data. The CHSI provides information on health indicators such as tobacco use, diet and activity, alcohol and drug use, to create community profiles. Measures of health, causes of death, population vulnerability, and access to care, demographics, and risk factors are among the reports available on a county by county basis. The County Health Rankings & Roadmap program collects data about factors that influence health that includes high school graduation rates, obesity, unemployment, access to healthful foods, air and water quality. County Health Rankings provides information about health outcomes such as length of life and quality of life, as measured by poor health, poor mental health, and low birth weight.
Integration of public datasets with the APCDs
The addition of health factors and morbidity data would create a rich data set. Advanced analysis of the APCDs in conjunction with health and morbidity measurements will highlight interesting, important, or overlooked relationships among claims data, health outcomes, and factors influencing health. Through exploring and understanding these relationships, all stakeholders in the healthcare system will have a better understanding of how cost, quality, and effectiveness of care intersect. Literal mapping of these data, by using location based datasets, would enable users of all analytic levels to consume the data visually.
To read more about Virginia Long and David Mould’s thoughts on APCDs, visit the full iHealthBeat post, “Link All-Payer Claims Databases With Other Data To Boost Transparency.”
Get our take on industry trends
Use SDOH + Analytics to power better outcomes for underserved population
Whether you’re a payer, provider or patient, on the front lines of care, sitting in front of a computer or receiving treatment, you’ve been affected by the pandemic. Of all the groups who participate in healthcare in one way or another, perhaps no single group has suffered more over the last year during the pandemic than the underserved— those people without ready access to needed healthcare services.
Read on...Go beyond recognition: Use data to take meaningful action this Nurses Week
Since 1994, America has observed National Nurses Week annually from May 6-12. This year more than ever before, it’s critical that healthcare organizations go beyond recognition and start taking action to more effectively support and serve nurses.
Read on...The future of digital health part 3: AI, machine learning and robotics
This post is part three of a new series featuring healthcare visionary and thought leader Andy Dé. In this series, Dé discusses how COVID-19 has triggered remarkable digital transformation and uncovers five, long-term innovation implications that providers, healthcare leaders, and payers need to consider.
Read on...The future of digital health part 2: Digital patient engagement and virtual healthcare delivery
Protecting the health, well-being and safety of healthcare practitioners and first responders is paramount — and will accelerate adoption of Digital Patient Engagement (DPE), enabled by Virtual Healthcare Delivery (VHD) solutions (also known as “Hospital at Home.)”
Read on...